Author(s): Geoff Boeing

USC study shows which street network designs are more resilient to disasters

Upload your content
People on a main street in Ginza, Tokyo on a hot day protecting themselves from the heat by using umbrellas.
Ned Snowman/Shutterstock

Street network designs play a big role in improving a city's resilience to disasters, according to a study from Assistant Professor Geoff Boeing.

What he researched: Boeing and his colleague simulated more than 2.4 billion trips across every urban area in the world to measure street network vulnerability to disasters and show how street network design shapes disaster resilience and recovery.

  • The findings: Street networks with higher connectivity, fewer chokepoints, and less circuity better allow people and goods to continue moving after a disaster.
  • Why it matters: Planners should emphasize these characteristics when designing or retrofitting street networks, so our infrastructure holds up when we need it most.
  • In his words: "A sprawling, branching street network is easy to disconnect by knocking out a few key nodes that link neighborhoods together," Boeing said. "But even otherwise dense, connected Amsterdam, for example, can be easy to disconnect by targeting its chokepoints, like canal bridges."

Explore further

Please note: Content is displayed as last posted by a PreventionWeb community member or editor. The views expressed therein are not necessarily those of UNDRR, PreventionWeb, or its sponsors. See our terms of use

Is this page useful?

Yes No
Report an issue on this page

Thank you. If you have 2 minutes, we would benefit from additional feedback (link opens in a new window).