A disaster by any other name?: COVID‐19 and support for an All‐Hazards approach

This paper discusses how disasters are among the crises that can test the decision making skill of elected and appointed public officials from planning through response and recovery. The COVID‐19 crisis, a public health emergency rather than one with immediate damage to the built environment, has affected many aspects of community life.

Experiences in responding to the pandemic will likely stimulate fresh planning initiatives for public health emergencies. How then should emergency planners approach planning and response tasks? The All‐Hazards approach has been a mainstay of both research and policymaking for over 40 years, but it has come under recent criticism.

This paper considers if the All‐Hazards approach to disaster management is still viable. Comparing the management needs that emerged in the pandemic with those of disasters from more familiar hazard agents, we conclude that the All‐Hazards approach is valid and can continue to guide policymakers in their hazard and disaster management activities.