What 1.5C overshoot would mean for climate impacts and adaptation

With average global temperatures set to see another record high this year, the chances of holding warming to no more than 1.5C continue to dwindle.

Keeping warming below 1.5C by the end of the century - in line with the long-term goal of the Paris Agreement - now likely involves "overshooting" 1.5C and then bringing temperatures back down later by removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere.

(What this means for "net-negative" emissions is covered in a previous guest post.)

This raises a number of unknowns in terms of what overshoot means for the impacts of climate change on the planet, people and ecosystems.

For example, even if global temperatures can be brought back down again by the end of the century, will the impacts of climate change also reduce? Will coral reefs be able to recover or will glaciers reform? What will it mean for the world's coastlines, food production and endangered species?

For the past three years, we have been working on a Horizon Europe-funded project called PROVIDE to dive deeper into what overshoot really looks like for countries, regions and cities.

This data is available on the Climate Risk Dashboard - a tool to help people see how climate change will affect them and how it depends on the actions taken today.

Until carbon emissions are reduced to net-zero, the world will not stop warming. Delay will result in ever more intense climate impacts - and increase the risk of crossing irreversible thresholds.

Urban heat stress under overshoot

One of the clearest and most acute impacts of climate change is on extreme heatwaves. Our findings suggest that, were global average temperatures to decline, extreme heat events in most locations will also decrease, on average.

But achieving a new balance in local climates would be a slow process, influenced by ongoing climate system adjustments for decades - if not centuries - to come.

Reversing climate change would most probably take several decades, even if overshoot is limited to a few tenths of a degree. This implies that the climate risks that generations alive today will be exposed to are largely determined by collective actions today.

We can illustrate these differences for the risks of extreme heat stress for the Indian city of Chennai, one of 140 cities for which we modelled urban heat stress risks at 100-metre spatial resolution.

The chart below shows the projected annual number of days of extreme heat stress in Chennai - defined as days where wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) goes over 31C. (WBGT is a metric that combines air temperature, humidity and exposure to direct sunlight.)

This level of heat stress approaches the limits of human survivability (without adaptation) - for example, physical outdoor labour is almost impossible under these conditions.

Under current 2020 climate policies, leading to a best estimate of about 3C of warming in 2100, extreme heat days increase pretty much unchecked. By the end of the century, around half of the days (180) per year would experience extreme heat stress conditions (or even higher).

In contrast, in a 1.5C low-overshoot scenario (the IPCC Shifting Pathway), the number of extreme heat stress days would peak mid-century at around 120 days , before declining again to around 110 days by 2100 as global average temperature decreases from just above 1.5C to around 1.3C. This is a modest decline in extreme heat risk, yet a profound difference from a 3C world.

Irreversible consequences from overshoot

There are many other impacts of climate change that will be irreversible - for centuries to millennia - at peak temperatures, let alone if society is able to bring warming back down.

Coral reef loss, glacier loss, sea level rise and the loss of many species and ecosystems all fall into this category.

Yet, a lot of these losses can still be avoided by stringent mitigation. For example, our multi-scenario framework allows us to explore glacier futures showing unavoidable, or "locked-in", risks even under the lowest emission scenario we have explored, and compare them with the avoidable risks through stringent mitigation.

Below, we provide an example for glacier volume projections for Peru, where glaciers serve as an essential freshwater resource during the extremely dry season of June to September. Due to past warming, glacier loss will continue over the coming decades. Under a current policy scenario, 50% of the glacier volume might be lost as early as 2050.

Yet this does not need to happen. In fact, stringent mitigation pathways are still possible that give a four-in-five chance of preserving 50% of today's glacier ice in Peru, avoiding the worst and helping to maintain some of their vital uses.

View a related video

Overshoot risks for the biosphere

Climate change represents a major threat to biodiversity globally. We modelled species at risk from local extinction for about 135,000 terrestrial fungi, plants, invertebrates and vertebrates based on the Wallace Initiative.

Under the assumption that the 1950-2000 reference climate was suitable for the species at question, we model the proportion of species for which the local climate becomes unsuitable under ongoing climate change.

In the chart below, we illustrate the risks to species in one of the countries with the world's richest terrestrial biodiversity, Brazil. Under the current policy scenario, the likelihood of 50% of species being at risk of local extinction rises to 74% by 2100. Yet, our analysis shows that this likelihood can still be avoided almost entirely by stringent mitigation.

It is important to highlight that species loss does depend on a range of factors - of which climate suitability is only one. Yet there is a range of other human-caused stressors to biodiversity loss and a complex interdependencies of species and food webs in particular in the most biodiverse ecosystems implies the risk of knock-on effects and ecosystem tipping points.

We also note that our results do not necessarily imply global species extinction and do not allow us to quantify if and how species survival under different overshoot trajectories would emerge.

Overshoot will stress adaptation planning

Overshoot outcomes matter for climate risk assessments. Yet, in contrast with the prominence of overshoot pathways in the climate mitigation literature, their implications for adaptation planning have not been widely explored.

Overshoot would increase the threat of climate change that society needs to adapt to - and make that adaptation more difficult. Some options may become unavailable due to limits of adaptation.

Also, timescales matter. Reversing an overshoot will take decades. Even assuming reversibility of climate hazards in the future as temperatures come down, this might only matter for adaptation decisions that involve a planning horizon of 50 years or more.

This is illustrated in the chart below, from our recent Nature study. This shows a stylised trajectory of warming (top chart) with overshoot (red bars) and how it compares to planning horizons for some example adaptation options (green bars), the lifetime of those measures (blue bars) and the intergenerational equity they involve (bottom chart).

The possibility of reversing long-term impacts in the future does not reduce the urgent need to act now on closing the wide gap in current adaptation efforts.

Limit peak warming and aim for long-term decline

While our results clearly underscore the importance of limiting peak warming to as low as possible, there are also very good arguments for aiming for a long-term global temperature decline, irrespective of the peak warming level.

For a wide range of time-lagged climate impacts, such as ice sheet, peatland and permafrost loss, as well as large-scale irreversible tipping points, achieving temperature decline well below 1.5C is key to limiting long-term risks from global warming.

Overshoot is clearly not an alternative way to achieve a similar climate outcome. Effectively limiting climate risks requires restricting peak warming as low and as close to 1.5C as possible - and then aim for long-term decline to reduce the climate impact legacy of human-caused emissions.