![]() |
Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2013
From Shared Risk to Shared Value: the Business Case for Disaster Risk Reduction |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() 23
Introduction: Risky Business
Disasters can seriously undermine business competitiveness
and longer-term economic sustainability. In the last two years, many businesses experienced
direct losses or impacts in the supply chain affecting their profitability. If critical infrastructure
such as transport networks and power sup-ply are affected, businesses suffer. But business is affected not
only as a consequence of direct and indirect losses but also owing to
wider impacts and macroeconomic effects.
Market share may be lost as clients transfer their business to competitors; skilled workers may
move or find other jobs; and relationships with suppliers and retailers can be severed. Consequently, business
image and reputation may be permanently damaged, affecting longer-term sustainability.
Critically, global trade, financial markets and supply chains have become increasingly interconnected. When
local disasters occur in globally integrated economies, the impacts ripple through regional and global
supply chains causing indirect losses to businesses on the other side of the globe.
1.1
Like pouring water into a
bamboo basket
The 1990s were what they call a “lost decade” for the Japanese economy as a whole, and the Port of Kobe was already losing its comparative advantage. However, it was the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake that drastically accelerated its decline.
During the 1960s and 1970s, the Port of Kobe, Japan, was the principal transport hub between Asian manufacturers and markets in North America. In the 1980s, however, its market share began
to fall owing to high costs, inflexible operations and powerful labour unions (Containerisation International, 1998
Containerisation International. 1998.,Japanese port study initiated., Containerisation International, 1 August 1998.. . Prior to the 1995 earthquake, Kobe was the world’s sixth-busiest port. After the quake, it failed to recover that prominence (see Box 1.1 below). Following two years of rebuilding, in March 1997, Kobe had fallen to 17th place worldwide (Chang, 2000b
Chang, S.E. 2000b.,Transportation Performance, Disaster Vulnerability and Long-term effets of Earthquakes., Second EuroConference on Global Change and Catastrophe Risk Management, 6-9 July 2000., Laxenburg,Austria.. . Nagamatsu, S. 2007.,Economic Problems During Recovery from the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake., Journal of Disaster Research Vol.2, N°5, 372-380.. . Chapter 1
(Source: UNISDR) Box 1.1 The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake
At 5:46 am on 17 January 1995, a 7.3 Mw earthquake in the southern part of Japan’s Hyogo Prefecture killed 6,437 people (Government of Japan, 2011
Government of Japan. 2011.,Disaster Management in Japan., February 2011., Tokyo,Japan.. . Chang, S.E. 2000a.,Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake., Journal of Transport Geography 8 (2000) 53-65.. . Nagamatsu, S. 2007.,Economic Problems During Recovery from the 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake., Journal of Disaster Research Vol.2, N°5, 372-380.. . Chang, S.E. 2000a.,Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake., Journal of Transport Geography 8 (2000) 53-65.. . City Government of Kobe. 2010.,Comprehensive Strategy for Recovery from the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake., March 2010., Kobe,Japan.. . Chang, S.E. 2000a.,Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake., Journal of Transport Geography 8 (2000) 53-65.. . |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |